Skip to content

0.14 B1 canonical local-agent result

Tracking issue: #420
Parent research cycle: #417
Canonical workflow: 36529108855
Canonical source: b9eadefd3cd076f026a54bbc55a949f0424f5dab

Status

B1 is terminal.

The canonical run completed all 30 frozen micro-shards and aggregated exactly 552 unique (catalog_size, task_id, condition) episodes.

The canonical aggregate is identified by:

  • artifact: agent-utility-b1-canonical-36529108855
  • artifact id: 11021506964
  • artifact digest: sha256:2e101d62dbe7f3202a24f0f40c49000064991b1521c4154c8feeb587de510271
  • aggregate JSON SHA-256: 33678700298a47b451ea1f03377cd874a1a1e373597cf961d207e07ae39f568d
  • corrected task SHA-256: bc0b78ff2be11b89e6ac54ea0ee336f944f04b3c203fc61da70a46ff48b4e03c

A compact machine-readable record is stored in benchmarks/results/agent-utility-b1-canonical-summary.json.

Frozen runtime

  • model: Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B
  • revision: c1899de289a04d12100db370d81485cdf75e47ca
  • CPU float32
  • Python 3.12.14
  • torch 2.14.0+cpu
  • transformers 4.57.6
  • tokenizers 0.22.2
  • safetensors 0.8.0
  • greedy decoding
  • thinking disabled
  • maximum 6 agent turns
  • seed 20260929

B1 remains a sanity and reproducibility baseline. The 23 semantic tasks are clustered across four catalog repeats and do not support a broad population-level non-inferiority claim.

Main result

Condition Task pass Required-route retrieval recall Mean tool-schema tokens Schema tokens vs FULL Gate
FULL 68.48% 100.00% 24,269.6 100.00% reference
SR-3 82.61% 96.55% 800.6 3.30% fails retrieval gate
SR-5 91.30% 100.00% 1,315.9 5.42% pass
SR-10 81.52% 100.00% 2,476.8 10.21% pass
SR-PROGRESSIVE 82.61% 100.00% final 2,986.9 12.31% pass
ORACLE 86.96% 100.00% 441.3 1.82% diagnostic

For the fixed small Qwen agent, SR-5 improved deterministic task pass by +22.83 percentage points relative to FULL while exposing only 5.42% of FULL tool-schema tokens.

The task-clustered paired bootstrap interval for the SR-5 minus FULL task-pass delta was +9.78pp to +36.96pp on this frozen 23-task surface. This interval is descriptive for B1; it is not a population-level non-inferiority or general-agent claim.

Why the result matters

B1 directly tests the 0.14 product thesis rather than treating Top-1 routing as the primary objective.

The same tool-using model received either the full catalog or a bounded SchemaRouter candidate set. SR-5 retained every required route across the 20/50/100/250 endpoint catalog strata and materially reduced schema context. On this controlled small-agent surface, exposing fewer relevant tools also produced higher task completion than exposing the full catalog.

This supports the mechanism-level hypothesis:

SchemaRouter can function as a compact typed capability-retrieval substrate in front of an agent, rather than needing to be the autonomous final tool selector.

It does not establish that SR-5 is universally optimal or that every stronger agent will show the same benefit.

Additional observations

  • SR-3 missed the preregistered retrieval eligibility threshold: required-route recall was 96.55%, below 97%.
  • SR-5 and SR-10 had 100% required-route recall and 100% all-required task coverage on the frozen surface.
  • unauthorized destructive executions were 0 in every condition.
  • SR-PROGRESSIVE reached 100% final retrieval coverage, but its four initial required-set misses yielded 0 recovered completed tasks. The current progressive interaction policy therefore receives no superiority claim from B1.
  • FULL becomes extremely expensive for the 0.6B CPU agent as catalog size grows. The latency observations are operational evidence for this exact runtime, not a provider-independent latency forecast.
  • ORACLE did not dominate SR-5 in task pass. That is a useful reminder that an extremely minimal tool surface is not automatically the easiest interaction surface for a small generative agent.

Claim boundary

B1 supports:

  • the controlled Qwen3-0.6B mechanism/sanity claim;
  • exact retrieval/context/task-pass measurements for this frozen benchmark;
  • promotion to a materially stronger B2 replication.

B1 alone does not support:

  • general statistical non-inferiority;
  • claims about all LLM agents;
  • claims about final-answer factuality, unit correctness or provenance;
  • production-grade generalization.

Those require #423, #432, and #424 respectively.